ma.gnolia

Sign In | Learn More

Skip to main content


Dave Shea: Image Replacement + Google Dave Shea: Image Replacement + Google

  • Rated 4 stars out of 5.
  • Copy Bookmark

> So it appears that, short of a set of stone tablets carried down from the hills of Mountain View, we do have a fairly clear answer. Using CSS image replacement in a responsible way, where the image truthfully represents the content it’s replacing, is safe to use. The simple act of hiding text from users is not enough to get your site banned from Google’s index. I think most of us have always suspected non-shady use of image replacement would be fine by Google, but now we (mostly) know for sure. Thanks, Dave!

14 other people have commented on this bookmark

1 2 3

Name Title Rating When
17340_32 naturegeek mezzoblue § Image Replacement Google
Not rated yet.
about 1 month ago.
1_32 lisakate Image replacement and Google
Not rated yet.
June 10, 2008

Article describes appropriate use of image replacement as deemed by Google

4875_32 Jared mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google
Not rated yet.
May 17, 2008
5_32 Jason mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google
Not rated yet.
May 16, 2008

mezzoblue: a weblog by dave shea, a web designer in vancouver, b.c., canada.

13869_32 Joshua mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google
Rated stars out of 5.
May 10, 2008

1 group has this bookmark in their collection

Name Title Rating When
3586_32 NDM Creative mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google
Not rated yet.
May 6, 2008

The short, short version is that image replacement is ok by Google so long as you're not doing dodgy stuff. Which is logical.