Dave Shea: Image Replacement + Google
> So it appears that, short of a set of stone tablets carried down from the hills of Mountain View, we do have a fairly clear answer. Using CSS image replacement in a responsible way, where the image truthfully represents the content it’s replacing, is safe to use. The simple act of hiding text from users is not enough to get your site banned from Google’s index. I think most of us have always suspected non-shady use of image replacement would be fine by Google, but now we (mostly) know for sure. Thanks, Dave!
14 other people have commented on this bookmark
| Name | Title | Rating | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| naturegeek | mezzoblue § Image Replacement Google |
Not rated yet.
|
about 1 month ago. | |
| lisakate | Image replacement and Google |
Not rated yet.
|
June 10, 2008 | |
Article describes appropriate use of image replacement as deemed by Google |
||||
| Jared | mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google |
Not rated yet.
|
May 17, 2008 | |
| Jason | mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google |
Not rated yet.
|
May 16, 2008 | |
mezzoblue: a weblog by dave shea, a web designer in vancouver, b.c., canada. |
||||
| Joshua | mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google |
Rated stars out of 5.
|
May 10, 2008 | |
1 group has this bookmark in their collection
| Name | Title | Rating | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDM Creative | mezzoblue § Image Replacement + Google |
Not rated yet.
|
May 6, 2008 | |
The short, short version is that image replacement is ok by Google so long as you're not doing dodgy stuff. Which is logical. |
||||
