An alternative to an oEmbed API
An argument against oEmbed as a separate API and for using a more RESTful approach (eg, content-type with application/oembed+json on the original URL)
2 other people have commented on this bookmark
| Name | Title | Rating | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lachlan | Backdrifter: oEmbed FAIL! Represent RESTfully. |
Not rated yet.
|
May 14, 2008 | |
oEmbed is the latest standard to come out of the Web 2.0 developer crowd. While I’m typically a huge advocate of standards, and think much of the prior work has been superb, oEmbed fails on almost every level. So much so, in fac... |
||||
| Chris | Backdrifter: oEmbed FAIL! Represent RESTfully. |
Rated stars out of 5.
|
May 13, 2008 | |
Decent critical look at oEmbed. |
||||
1 group has this bookmark in their collection
| Name | Title | Rating | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DiSo Project | Backdrifter: oEmbed FAIL! Represent RESTfully. |
Rated stars out of 5.
|
May 13, 2008 | |
Decent critical look at oEmbed. |
||||
